The author of the exception the report
Jan 1, 2024 19:18:45 GMT -8
Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 19:18:45 GMT -8
ARomania Part I no. of May . . In accordance with the provisions of art. para. from Law no. the notification act was communicated to the presidents of the two Chambers of the Parliament the Government and the Peoples Advocate in order to express their views on the raised exception of unconstitutionality. . The government shows that the exception of unconstitutionality is unfounded. It is shown that the criticized texts do not violate the provisions of art. art. and art. of the Constitution . . The Presidents of the two Chambers of the Parliament and the Peoples.
Advocate did not communicate their points Country Email List of view on the exception of unconstitutionality. COURT examining the notification document the Governments point of view the written notes ofdrawn up by the judgerapporteur the conclusions of the representative of the author of the exception the conclusions of the prosecutor the criticized legal provisions related to the provisions of the Constitution as well as Law no. notes the following . The Constitutional Court was legally notified and is competent accordingly provisions of art. lit. d from the.
Constitution as well as from art. paragraph of art. and of Law no. to resolve the exception of unconstitutionality. . The object of the exception of unconstitutionality is according to the conclusion of notification the provisions of art. art. para. art. and art. para. of the Criminal Procedure Code. From the analysis of the exception of unconstitutionality the Court notes however that the author criticizes in reality the provisions of art. para. art. para. art. para. and art. para. of the Code of Criminal Procedure which at the time of invoking the exception had the following content Art. para. The.
Advocate did not communicate their points Country Email List of view on the exception of unconstitutionality. COURT examining the notification document the Governments point of view the written notes ofdrawn up by the judgerapporteur the conclusions of the representative of the author of the exception the conclusions of the prosecutor the criticized legal provisions related to the provisions of the Constitution as well as Law no. notes the following . The Constitutional Court was legally notified and is competent accordingly provisions of art. lit. d from the.
Constitution as well as from art. paragraph of art. and of Law no. to resolve the exception of unconstitutionality. . The object of the exception of unconstitutionality is according to the conclusion of notification the provisions of art. art. para. art. and art. para. of the Criminal Procedure Code. From the analysis of the exception of unconstitutionality the Court notes however that the author criticizes in reality the provisions of art. para. art. para. art. para. and art. para. of the Code of Criminal Procedure which at the time of invoking the exception had the following content Art. para. The.
